p2 hero.png

Project Overview

 

 Brief

Open Books is a nonprofit, local bookstore located in Chicago and all their profits goes towards youth literacy programs. The project brief was to increase checkout conversion rates for their local business during covid-19 and ensure a safe curbside pickup process.

Role

UX Designer

Duration

2-week design sprint

Tools

Pen & Paper, Whimsical, Zoom, Figma

UX Methods

  • Competitive Analysis

  • Heuristic Evaluation

  • Sitemap

  • IA

  • Card Sorting

  • User Flows

  • Sketching

  • Wireframe

  • Prototyping

  • Usability Testing


PROBLEM

Local businesses are hit during covid-19

Small businesses like Open Books were drastically affected during covid-19, so they needed to digitalize their storefront for customers to purchase books. I asked myself - how do you redesign an e-commerce experience so customers would choose to support them rather than buy from big corporations?


DESIGN HYPOTHESIS + SOLUTION

Users will buy more books if book genres are reorganized

I leveraged the user research and the design analyses to maximize the way for the users to easily find their desired book choice and an easy checkout experience. Specifically, I hypothesized that if I fix the information architecture of the current website then user’s will buy more books and have a pleasant shopping experience.

Features to focus on:

  1. Category organization

  2. Product reviews & recommended products

  3. Checkout


COMPARATIVE RESEARCH

Open Books funds literacy programs

I analyzed 3 used book store competitors who had successful e-commerce experience. They all had similar traits, BUT I found that Open Books’ speciality was they were the only bookstore that used their profits to give back to the community.

p2 competitors.png

HEURISTIC EVALUATION + SITEMAP

Too much redundancy

I conducted an heuristic evaluation and analyzed the current sitemap of the website because I wanted to identify any drop off points for their current users.

These were the main issues of the current desktop site:

  1. excessive amount of information

  2. same buttons led to the same pages

  3. unclear checkout process

  4. checkout process can be minimized

  5. shipping is chosen for you

  6. categories are messy


USER PERSONA

The Careful Critic

Due to time constraints of the design sprint, I used hypothetical user research that presented to me in the project brief. The user is a “Careful Critic” who makes thorough decisions and does research before purchasing a book. I used an illustration as the avatar because I wanted to be inclusive and set aside any preconceived biases as I designed.


CARD SORTING

“I can’t find the book genre I want”

I conducted an open card sort with three users where I asked them to individually group 70 book genres. I analyzed their decisions while they sorted the book into separate categories. I specifically asked users to sort book categories because I identified it as a major friction point on the original website. Through the research analysis, I discovered that the users used similar book category titles and I chose the six recurring themes.


USER FLOWS

Cart Checkout Happy Path

Based on the wants, needs, and goals of “The Careful Critic,” I created their happy path or user flow of how they purchase a book. This user flow helped me prioritize the features for the MVP and decrease any drop off points. I empathized with “The Careful Critic” and I wanted to make their checkout flow as easy as possible.


FIRST ITERATION

Sketches

Based on the user persona and the user flow, I sketched out pages of what the Careful Critic would see when they completed their tasks. I wanted the Careful Critic to easily find what book they’re looking for as well as easily complete their checkout process.


SECOND ITERATION

Low Fidelity Wireframes

I used my sketches as guidelines to create low fidelity wireframes in Figma. I laid out the specific features that the Careful Critic would use like filtering a book, checkout process, and curbside pickup.


USABILITY TESTING + IMPROVEMENTS

What did users think?

Based on the user feedback I received from usability tests, I identified the friction points and reiterated into a high fidelity prototype. This helped me see the blind spots I might’ve missed as a designer and understand the users’ perspective better. Specifically, I focused on three pages - landing page, product list, and checkout.


FINAL PROTOTYPE

Prototype Walkthrough


NEXT STEPS

Future Ideas

  • Build out the product description - I want to explore ideas on what the “let’s compare” tab would look like for the Careful Critic to compare book prices with other ones

  • Explore different landing page styles - I want to see if adding boxes would improve the usability and overall visual design

  • Conduct more usability testings - iterations are important to improve the designs for users, so I’d like to conduct more usability testing on a more diverse user group


REFLECTION

Lessons I learned

  1. You will learn from comparative analysis. Doing comparative analysis helped me understand the industry standards of what an e-commerce bookstore looked like and it gave me ideas on how I want to design Open Book’s e-commerce website.

  2. Usability Testing is essential. I learned and used the feedback I received from my three usability testings to improve the overall user experience of the e-commerce website. I am fully aware that I can get tunnel vision from the perspective of a designer, so it was great to break the cover and hear from a user’s perspective. For example, I wouldn’t have realized how confusing the checkout pages were until the users pointed it out to me.


←Back

←Back

Next→

Next→